advert

High Court rules in favour of Aduana Abrade family of Asabi in Berekuso land dispute – MyJoyOnline

3 Min Read
High Court rules in favour of Aduana Abrade family of Asabi in Berekuso land dispute – MyJoyOnline

0:00

A recent High Court decision in Koforidua has resolved a long-standing land dispute in Berekuso, Eastern Region, Ghana. The court ruled in favour of the Aduana Abrade family of Asabi, declaring them the rightful owners of a large tract of land in the area.

The disputed land, situated at Asabi-Berekuso, spans approximately 409.17 acres and is bounded by lands owned by Mankralo, Onyaakesease, Dedeikrom, and the NII Ngleshie Addy Stool.

Justice Jennifer A.M. Ahmed who ruled that the Aduana Abrade family, the plaintiffs, are the rightful owners, also recognised Comet Properties’ valid acquisition of 230 acres.

The court’s decision also perpetually enjoined Comet Properties Limited, the defendant, from dealing with any land beyond the limits specified in Exhibits “7” and “C”. These exhibits refer to a lease agreement dated May 15, 2002, and an assignment registered in 2012, which outline the terms of Comet Properties Limited’s leasehold interest in the land.

The family has therefore advised the public to take note of the court’s decision and to exercise due diligence in dealing with Comet Properties Limited or any other parties involved in the dispute. It said the family secretary, Linda Kye-Duodu should be contacted for any further clarification or information at 0536177213.

Final Judgment and Orders

The court ruled as follows:

  1. The Aduana Abrade family of Asabi are the rightful owners of the land in Asabi-Berekuso, except for the 230 acres validly acquired by the defendant.
  2. The defendant is confirmed as the beneficial owner of the 230-acre land as per Exhibits C and 7.
  3. The plaintiffs are entitled to recover any land beyond the 230 acres lawfully acquired by the defendant.
  4. The defendant, its agents, privies, assigns, and servants are perpetually restrained from interfering with lands beyond the scope of Exhibits C and 7.
  5. The plaintiffs were awarded costs amounting to GH¢50,000 against the defendant.

See the full ruling in the attached document.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version